Page 94 of 749

Pop’s Got Balls

Season 50, Game 12
San Antonio 110, Sacramento 105
9-3, 3rd in the West

The last line of my notes from Wednesday’s win against the Kings was: “How long will Pop let this go on?”

What was shaping up to be a nice little blowout turned into a tense drama (or comical farce, or a horror show, depending on your viewpoint or mood), as the Kings starters made a 14-2 surge in the final two minutes of game action against the Spurs deep bench (“scrubs”, if we’re being less generous).

Pop was going to let it ride, win or lose. I can admire that. But damn, would we have been furious with him if the Spurs had lost that game. Because if they had, that would be on him. He made a choice to let his rookies and unproven players figure it out on their own in those final minutes, come what may.

Most will praise Pop, saying this is the kind of seasoning that young players need to grow. (Hindsight is 20/20, and most reactions are results-based, not process-based.) I can see that argument, and agree with it to an extent. But I think there is a counterargument that could be made, which goes like this: it’s dangerous to let rookies fail so spectacularly in such a public fashion, and it can do real damage to their confidence and psyche.

Of course, the real answer depends on the individual player. And Pop might counter that he doesn’t want a player on his roster who doesn’t have the mental fortitude to withstand that, let alone learn from it, take it to heart, and use it as motivation. Maybe this situation is exactly what Pop wanted to see to evaluate what he has in these players.

If a player is crushed by those three minutes, he doesn’t belong in the NBA. If he belongs in the NBA, those three minutes will strengthen and harden him.

At least we won. It would have been an epic collapse if we’d lost, and Pop would take so much heat for it. And he wouldn’t care. Like I said in my headline, Pop’s got balls.

A few thoughts on the actual game portion of the night:

• Gasol continues to look great. He seems more comfortable and assertive in the system, and his chemistry with Parker is noticeable. (Imagine if the two had been able to play together in their primes?) He is the only player in the NBA shooting 50% outside the paint (minimum 50 shots). The jump shot is money. And he is making a concerted effort to be a playmaker.

If his defense is passable (last night it was actually quite good), he’ll continue to be a huge plus for us.

• Along the same lines, Parker has looked great since coming back from injury. To harken back to a guiding principle of the season, Parker get the offense organized better than any other player on the roster. Couple that with his increased energy and ability to attack the basket, and he is still a very effective offensive player.

When he and Mills are both playing well, it’s such a huge bonus to get 48 minutes of well above-average PG play.

• I’m going to give Aldridge’s offensive woes a pass for now, as he played his butt off guarding DeMarcus Cousins, probably the most difficult cover in all of the NBA. He was relentless and put his whole body into it.

I will note, though, that I lack confidence in his shot. And each of the other four starters had game +/- of +25, +25, +30, and +29, while LaMarcus was a meager +5.

• David Lee has fit in so well with the second unit. He’s not as tricky or as graceful (really) as Diaw, but he serves a similar function. His passing is quite clever, he moves well without the ball, and is just as happy on either end of an assist and basket. I’ve been happy with his defense (where his reputation is bad) and his rebounding.

As long as he’s happy with his bench role and doesn’t agitate to start or for more minutes, he is a steal of a contract.

• Those final minutes aside, Bertans had some solid minutes. His shot is so pretty. He doesn’t seem comfortable shooting yet. He either hesitates or shoots it too quickly. Once he figures that out, look out.

More impressively, his defense and mobility are better than advertised. I’m looking forward to seeing his continued development.

The Spurs finish up this mini two-game West Coast road trip Friday nigth against the Lakers.

Go Spurs Go.

Barely Holding On

Season 50, Game 11
San Antonio 94, Miami 90
8-3, 3rd in the West

There are a few games like this every year. The Spurs get a comfortable first half lead and go into cruise control; the other team raises their energy level and defensive intensity, and the Spurs scramble to hold on to the lead and match the other team’s intensity.

Sometimes, you get lucky and the clock runs out before the other team can pass you. That’s mostly what happened last night against the Heat. Miami kicked the Spurs butt in the second half; they just ran out of time.

It also helps that the Heat really couldn’t hit shots with enough consistency to get back into the game: 4-of-16 from 3 and 12-of-21 from the free throw line will doom you when there is no margin for error. On the other end, the Spurs shot 8-of-15 from 3 and 20-of-27 from the line. Not great numbers, but enough to hold off the offensively inept Miami Heat.

Unlike the electoral college, all points are counted equally. (Too soon?) So while we can lament the near-collapse and horrible play by the Spurs in the second half, we should not discount how well they handled their business in the first half. LaMarcus (clearly motivated by my calling him out last post) shot 8-of-9 in the first half, and was 2-of-2 from the line. Meaning, he shot the ball at the rim 11 times, and it went in 10. That’s good. He finished the half with 18 points. He finished the game with 18 points. But those points all count the same, regardless of when they went in.

The Spurs lost the second half 50-39, a pretty thorough defeat. But they were +15 in the first half, dominating the Heat on both ends of the floor. The Heat looked better at the end, but the Spurs had built up enough ‘good basketball’ to withstand it.

I’m hesitant to take too much away from tonight’s game. Miami is a really good defensive team. They gave us a lot of trouble in the second half. For whatever reason, the Spurs couldn’t ramp up to the next gear like the Heat did in that second half. I don’t necessarily think it’s indicative of some larger, systemic problem, though. It’s just a Monday night in November against an Eastern Conference team missing their best player. Every player on Miami is paid to play basketball professionally, just like the Spurs. There are no gimmes. (Plus, Dion Waiters has apparently made it his mission to get into the Hall of Fame solely based upon his performances agains the Spurs.)

Still, perhaps this game gives us some things that should warrant our attention:

• Kawhi hasn’t really dominated a game in a while. He nearly got outplayed (some might argue he did get outplayed) by Dion Waiters tonight. His handle was a bit loose, his jumper is still off, and he didn’t seem able to really break down the defense. On the other end, he rebounded extremely well, but he didn’t really lock anybody up. We’re due a big game from Kawhi.

• LaMarcus had a great first half, and then disappeared in the second half. He has had very few complete games this season.

• Our defense was really solid in the first half, average in the second half. When the defense was really good, it was because the wing defenders were completely denying penetration, and the Heat were forced to pass the ball around the perimeter and settle for long jumpers (which they made at an unreasonably low percentage). But if/when the Heat broke down the perimeter defense, they were met with very little resistance at the rim.

In many ways, the Spurs defense is inverted from what usually makes a great defense. The perimeter is strong, the interior is weak. Transition defense remains an issue.

• Miami did most of its offensive damage in transition and off Spurs miscues. They had very active hands, and the simple act of running a pick and roll was nearly impossible in the second half. Once the TO was created, the Spurs were too slow getting back on D.

• Gasol is not a great rim protector or paint stopper. He really needs to play great on offense to counteract his defensive liabilities. He has great size and length, but can have trouble keeping active bigs off of the offensive glass, blocking shots, or stopping penetration.

• Dedmon and Green both suffered injuries from hard incidental contact. Both are top defensive players and play important roles in the rotation. Let’s hope it’s nothing more serious.

After the slow start at home, any win on our own court is welcome.

The Spurs travel to Sacramento tomorrow night to face the Kings.

Go Spurs Go.

« Older posts Newer posts »