Author: Andrew Jason Flores (Page 3 of 10)

A Picture Says It All: Professor X

In the push for playoff supremacy, sometimes a team has to tweak their roster in what would seem like the slightest way to gain a significant advantage. Think of it like a sword maker who knows that he only needs to change one of 10 ingredients to make a blade sharper, stronger or lighter, in an effort to get an edge on the competition (drum roll – kick).

Photo courtesy of NBA.com

Photo courtesy of NBA.com

So why would the oldest team in the NBA choose to pick up the oldest player in the league? Could Andre “The Professor” Miller be that subtle tweak which makes the difference between finishing on top of the mountain and almost making it there? When I heard that the Spurs would sign Miller, I received several questions and comments from friends that I’d like to share with you:

“Typical Spurs! Picking old dudes to play for them while the young teams run them to the ground.”

Sure, the Spurs make it easy for the bandwagon (ahem – Golden State) fan to laugh at them, but genius is always made fun of by the less visionary. This particular “old dude” has been a key component to many teams who were serious about a championship. That’s what Miller offers: playoff experience and a keen understanding of what kind of effort is needed in a short amount of time (ala Steve Kerr).

“Who gets left out of the rotation?”

We all now knew Ray McCallum would be the one to get released, but having Miller might also mean fewer minutes for Manu. Pop has never been the kind of coach who puts his player’s health in jeopardy. If you think a regular season game against a division opponent is rough, the playoffs are only going to test Manu’s fortitude and conditioning to a greater degree. Most likely he’s going to be less Manu-like on defense, which means symbolically, Manu will not be a serious part of the roster come playoff time, which means more time for Miller.

(Editor’s note: After missing 12 games due to testicular injury, last night Manu Ginobili scored a season-high 22 points against the Sacramento Kings.)

“Why would the Spurs pick up someone so late in the season when it takes time to learn ‘the system’?”

This one took a while to figure out. Fans who watched the NBA from 2009 to 2011 will recall that Miller and LaMarcus Aldridge were a potent combo on the pick and pop in Portland. Miller may offer a surprise attack for a team whose offensive strategy is less than secretive. (Yes, I admit that the Spurs’ offense can be predictable at times.) Andre is a pure shooter who can score in stretches, but is an even better commander during crunch time, which is every playing second during the second season.

“The Spurs were obviously going for someone on the cheap over paying the money for a younger and more athletic Kevin Martin.”

Calling Miller’s talents cheap is anything but the truth as he is known for his high basketball IQ. Maybe the reason they went after the old man is because his smarts will ensure he fits into the system more quickly than a younger guy who is used to isolation play. If you haven’t noticed – isolation play tends to make our players look like they are stuck in the mud.

(Editor’s note: The Spurs will sign Kevin Miller, too.)

As a Spurs fan, I’m really excited about having Andre Miller join the team. He’s healthy and well rested. He is not going to be the shiny bench piece that T-Mac was in 2013. I believe we are all in for a pleasant surprise when “The Professor” provides the X-factor for “The Juice Crew.” Spurs Nation may have found another super hero come playoff time – I’m crossing my fingers.

A Picture Says It All: Fill The Line

When I reviewed the basic box score for the February 21st game at Phoenix, something “Spursy” jumped out at me.

It wasn’t the number of assists (23) or points by the bench (55). Despite being well known for dominating these categories, I feel these no longer differentiate the Spurs from the rest of league.

While casual fans look at how much a player scores (particularly when it’s 30 or higher), points only tell the story of a great offensive effort, where maybe the matchup was just right, or the player was just feeling it that game.

The fan who watches SportsCenter will pay closer attention to players good at getting the double-double. Because points scored is usually one of the categories involved – I am sure there are a few exceptions to this – I consider this distinction just another indication of a dominant attacking game.

True fans of basketball may proclaim that the real measure of an elite player is the triple-double. I would counter with the question: How many times does this result from a great offensive night combined with timely rebounding? When the secret could be fortunate positioning or playing against a team attempting a high volume of long-ranged jump shots, the triple double might simply be a circumstantial statistic, indicating nothing more than a solid offensive plan.

Of course, I am ignoring the rare players who consistently finish with 30+ points or a double-double; or those extremely talented ballers who produce triple-doubles as if a quota of them were a part of their contract. The operative phrase I am getting to is “individual effort.” Such impressive individual effort don’t guarantee a win.

What really gets my attention is how many players have a complete game. The way I define “complete” is to ask one question: Did they a put up a number in all five major statistical categories: rebounds, assists, steals, blocks and points?

Even if they only score two points, when a player fills the line (FTL) it means he was everywhere on the floor during his minutes played. I applaud finding a way to matter on both ends of the floor – what Coach Pop calls playing all 48 minutes.

Usually I note one Spur with that kind of effort for the night. You may or may not be surprised that, for our team, Danny Green has the honor of most FTL games this season.

Going back to reading the above mentioned box score, five players (four of them starters) had a complete game Sunday night. Sure, none of them actually played 48 minutes individually, but collectively it looked like a complete team effort on paper. Looking further, two other players had complete games but for one category.

I don’t care that the opponent was awful – the Suns worked hard on their home floor that night.

Prior to the match-up, the Spurs had beaten Phoenix six times in a row; the last four were won by 20+ point margins and the Suns were facing a season series sweep – something no team wants another to have on them.

Phoenix played for pride and it showed with their high scorer, a Tim Duncan understudy, having a career night. Even Fox Sports Southwest commentator, Sean “Grumpy Old Man” Elliot, said that he couldn’t be upset at the close score with the performance the Suns had.

Fortunately, our Spurs put on a better one, thanks to a collective effort that will go under the radar of the general media. And that’s just the way our Spurs like it.

« Older posts Newer posts »