Page 145 of 749

Making a Statement

They might not be in first place in the West or on the top of anyone’s power rankings, but there’s one thing the San Antonio Spurs are surely the best at: flying under-the-radar.

By design, and by virtue of Golden State having the most dominant start to an NBA season in the history of the association, the Spurs have drawn very little attention to their pretty good 22-5 start.

How good is this start? Well, it’s good enough to be the second best start to the season of a Popovich-coached Spurs team. The last time the Spurs looked this great this early was the 24-3 run they made to open the 2010-11 season, in which they finished #1 in the West before tail spinning and crashing into a nuclear power plant, causing an explosion that wiped out half a continent and proved that there is no good left in the world. But that is a tale for another time. Actually, I’d never like to talk about that season again, if you don’t mind.

There is something I do want to talk about regarding the 22-5 Spurs, however, and it’s that second number – the five losses. I’m not mad that the Spurs have five losses at this point in the season, but there’s something about four of those games that really digs at me.

San Antonio lost to Chicago, New Orleans, and Oklahoma City on national TV in what I’d call statement games. Then there was the loss to Toronto, which wasn’t nationally televised, but still had the makings of a big time game.

Here are the things I’d consider before calling a regular ol’ game a statement game:

• Your opponent is tough and they’ll be in the playoffs (bonus points if they’re a conference title contender).

• You’re playing on national television.

• You’re playing in a game that has big divisional race/playoff seeding implications.

• You’re on the road (but playing a great team at home is difficult, too).

• You need to rebound from an embarrassing loss.

The season opener was a double statement game. The Spurs had that first round playoff exit last season, then went out and signed LaMarcus Aldridge among other significant off-season roster moves. They were under the microscope more than they’ve ever been at the start of a season. On the other hand, the Thunder team facing the Spurs that night was completely healthy for the first time since October 2014 and fired their coach in the offseason, so they too had a lot to prove. Ultimately, San Antonio coughed up a seven-point lead in the final four minutes of the game and took the L.

Am I going to sit here behind my keyboard and condemn the Spurs for losing to an extremely talented team on the road to start the season? Absolutely not, that was a completely “acceptable” loss. Still, wouldn’t it have been fun for the Spurs to start out the season with a big win on the road? I think we’d all answer “yes” to that.

A few weeks later, San Antonio visited New Orleans for a divisional matchup on ESPN’s Friday Night Basketball. The Pelicans, who were 1-11 going into the game, ended up beating the 9-2 Spurs by 14 points. Typically, I’d say that a matchup with an opponent ten games under .500 isn’t really a statement game, but the Pelicans are the new Grizzlies – San Antonio had lost three of the four games they played last year, and with the latest loss, have lost four of their last five against New Orleans.

The statement would have been simple: the Spurs aren’t going to let bad teams surprise them and steal victories. Instead… the bad team surprised them. It’s not even so much that the Pelicans are bad (which they are), but that they’re bad AND were decimated by injuries when the Spurs came into town. So of course, some guy named Ryan Anderson who I’d never heard of before comes off the bench and shoots 12-21 for 30 points against the best defense in the NBA.

In the long run, that loss probably doesn’t mean anything, but that game ruined Tim Duncan’s game-with-a-rebound streak and caused me to yell at a TV while nervously eating too many tater tots. And if that’s not bad enough, look at the run-on sentences it’s just caused me to write!


Photo: Mike DiNovo-USA TODAY Sports

Next, the three-loss Spurs ventured to the mysterious and frozen land of Chicago to take on the Bulls. The Bulls are a weird team, but they are a good team. For example, they slipped past the Spurs by 3 points in their game, but then let Charlotte come in and beat them by 6 points in their own house five days later.

Anyway, San Antonio, with a 3-point lead over Chicago heading into the fourth quarter, disappeared on offense. And that’s what made this loss so frustrating. Against a good team, I think you’ve just got to go for the jugular when you see an opening. But the Spurs just didn’t seem to have the shots in them that night. They managed to keep it close, which I suppose they deserve some credit for, but I don’t think they care much about getting credit for a close loss.

These games happen, but gah, they’re even more frustrating than total “off nights” like the Spurs had in New Orleans.

Most recently, San Antonio (then 18-4) took a disappointing loss in Toronto (then 13-9). I can’t speak to much detail about this game since I don’t live in Canada or San Antonio where the game was broadcast, but the Spurs lost by 3 points and never once held the lead. In fact, they trailed for 46:57, which translates to roughly the entire game.

Still, the Spurs made it close with a run in the final minutes. And again, close is not enough. Another chance to shut down a playoff-bound team (barring any major injuries) on their home court slips away.

Here’s the good news: San Antonio has not lost a game at home this season, and they’ve only lost one game to a Western Conference team. Those two stats are both very important because if the Spurs keep this pace up, they’ll be playing lots of home playoff games against teams that also play in the Western Conference. So maybe I’m only frustrated with these losses because I’m so used to seeing the Spurs treat the Eastern Conference like a high school JV squad. Or maybe it’s because I watched the Golden State Warriors beat Toronto and Chicago with relative ease, and I so desperately wanted the Spurs to prove to the rest of the world that they’re insanely good, too.

But you know what? The Spurs have proved to the world that they’re insanely good. We have no reason to believe they’ll overcome their road woes, and I suspect that by the time annual Rodeo Road Trip comes around, we’ll see just how good of a road team they can be.

So San Antonio doesn’t have a signature win or a win streak of more than six games. What the Spurs do have is the most dominant defense in NBA history, the third best offense in the NBA, a bench that goes just as deep as anyone they’ll see come playoff time, the best coach in the association, and a 22-5 record going into mid-December.

I’d still love to see the team pull off a statement win, but if I have to wait until June to see it, well, I guess that’s something I can live with.

One Loss Avenged

Season 49, Game 27
San Antonio 114, Washington 95
22-5, 2nd in the West

The Wizards were owed one, and the Spurs weren’t going to let them off.

The Wizards beat the Spurs way back before we knew how great this Spurs team was. Now, weeks later, this new dominant Spurs squad had every motivation to lay into the struggling Wizards.

Except that’s not how the Spurs are wired. They don’t imagine slights for motivation; they don’t speak out of school. Every one in the league respects them, and their rivalries are played out purely on the floor. It’s a blessing and a curse. They tend to bring out the best in other teams, like the Clippers in last year’s playoffs. Had the Spurs mucked it up a bit with the mentally fragile Clippers, they might have pulled the series out. Instead, they played with respect and allowed the Clippers to break through their own mental barrier. (Of course, they immediately gave it back in the next round, because Clippers.)

So when the Spurs ‘owe’ you one, they give it to you the same as they do on any night: quiet, methodical, devastating.

This team is playing so well right now that a 15-point lead is what constitutes a ‘close’ game in the 3rd quarter. I’m so accustomed to 30-point leads that I fret when the team is up 19 with under 5 minutes to play.

To be fair, the Wizards played a great first half, particularly on offense. They scored 31 in the first quarter, an accomplishment in itself against this Spurs squad. John Wall was doing whatever he wanted on offense, and the Wall-Gortat pick and roll was flummoxing the Spurs’ defense.

Until Pop put Kawhi on Wall, and that pretty much ended that.

What a luxury to have a wing stopper like Kawhi who excels at every facet of defense. He plays sounds positional defense while still getting steals, turnovers, blocks, deflections, and wreaking general havoc everywhere. But he almost never gambles or gets lost. It’s incredible. As big a leap as he’s taken on offense this year, I still enjoy watching him on defense more.


(Photo: Antonio Morano / Special to Kens5.com)

In the third quarter, Kawhi put it all together and more or less took the game over for a 5-minute stretch, effectively putting the game out of reach for the Wizards. A 3-point game at the half, midway through the 3rd it was a 15-point deficit and the Spurs were rolling.

I was foolish to have ever been worried.

A few more thoughts from Wednesday’s win:

• With Duncan sitting, Pop was able to give Boban some real game-time minutes in a close game. He acquitted himself very well. While his hands are a bit slow around the rim, he continues to show a soft touch on his shots. And when he does get the ball near the rim, it’s pretty much a done deal. He also was able to get some extra possessions on offensive rebounds when the Washington defender just had no choice but to foul him to try and stop him.

On defense, he seems to be getting more and more comfortable in the system. His size alone deters plenty of drivers at the rim. He has quick feet relative to his size, and was even able to get some Duncan-like non-jumping blocks at the rim.

He’s still a long way from being a big player in a playoff series, but he’s the real deal.

• I thought Parker was playing a bit selfishly tonight, missing a lot of open players. He had 10 assists in 26 minutes. I might be an idiot.

• Manu continues to be great. It feels like Pop has found the perfect amount of minutes for him to maximize his amazing and curtail his crazy. He had 8 assists in 18 minutes, and continues to lead the charge for the bench unit, which routinely blows the game wide open or gets the team back in the game. Either way, my notes often read: the bench to the rescue.

• I miss you, Gary Neal, but I’m glad the Spurs don’t need you anymore. Seriously, would Gary find playing time on this Spurs’ team? It was obvious that he was putting the shot up every time he had it. He’s not good enough for a revenge game.

• Neither is DeJuan Blair. I don’t miss him, though I carry no ill will towards him. Wait, he viciously kicked at Splitter two years ago in the playoffs. Maybe I carry a little bit.

Speaking of avenging losses, the Clippers come to town Friday night. This is a big game and a real test for this Spurs squad. The Clippers have always played the Spurs tough in the Chris Paul era.

Go Spurs Go.

« Older posts Newer posts »